|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
Saddam's Nuclear Arsenal
Time magazine (January 12, 2003) published an interview with Director
General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mohamed El Baradei, who
states Iraq is a long way from developing nuclear weapons.
Fantasy is fine for the silver screen and wonderful books late into the
night, but when faced in the harsh light of present day geopolitical
threats it is time to pull our heads out of the sand and open our eyes.
There exists an unpleasant set of facts that suggests Saddam Hussein has
not only developed Hiroshima type atomic bombs, but has successfully
tested these weapons. Furthermore, Hussein did all of this prior to first
Gulf War.
CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE
It is one thing to develop a nuclear weapon; it is an entirely different
thing to test and prove the design. Iraq had two major problems: no fuel
and testing without detection.
The fuel was acquired from Brazil through a South African front company.
By 1989, Iraq had enough fuel to build three crude weapons. That is not a
typo; the year was 1989—two years before Desert Storm.
A test site where the weapon could be detonated and remain undetected
posed a more difficult prospect. Lake Rezzaza is 90 miles southwest of
Baghdad. It was a popular resort during the 1960s. In the late eighties it
assumed a more sinister attraction. Lake Rezzaza has a lava cave that
extends under the lake, and unless satellites were tasked to search for
the cave it remained invisible.
Iraq has proven to be masters of camouflage, and the Group 4 project was
no exception. Lake Rezzaza transformed into an irrigation and farming
project. From the God’s eye view provided by satellite reconnaissance, the
entire project appeared benign. It needs to be remembered that in the late
eighties, the primary focus of western intelligence was the Soviet Union,
and Israel’s space based assets were extremely limited to non-existent.
Finally, Iraq was engaged in a bloody and fruitless slugfest with Iran—
something American policy makers tacitly cheered.
The work force consisted of political prisoners and a specialized
scientific cadre. Security fell to the Special Republican Guard. The cave
under Lake Rezzaza was extended and reinforced. Work stopped on a schedule
dictated by orbiting American satellites. Russia or China or both probably
supplied the schedules.
Group 4 erected an elaborate scaffold inside the main cavern beneath the
lake. The purpose was to hide the effects of the constellation of Defense
Support Program satellites designed to detect the nuclear detonation flash
(among other things). They also needed to dampen the blast effects to
avoid seismic detectors. The scaffold suspended the weapon inside the
cavern and the yield was estimated to be approximately 10 kilotons. Once
armed, the cavern leading beneath the lake was back filled and sealed with
4 kilometers of concrete.
CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE
The scientists responsible for the bomb’s development live under a pending
death sentence should they talk.
There were two other weapons created by Group 4. Rumors place these
weapons in underground bunkers somewhere in the Hemrin Mountains north of
Baghdad. The sketches accompanying this article are allegedly from a
defector known as LEONE. According to nuclear bomb designers, the design
depicted is unconventional but workable.
A couple of questions need asking:
If Saddam had a nuke, why didn’t he use it during the Gulf War? I
speculate that Saddam lacked a credible delivery system. Remember Saddam’s
air force had an average flight time measured in seconds before AWACS
directed aircraft shot Iraqi planes down. It is unlikely Group 4 had time
to develop a warhead design capable of fusing and surviving a ballistic
missile launch.
Does Saddam currently have nuclear weapons? Besides Group 4, Saddam
commissioned Group 5. The purpose of the second group was to develop a
thermo-nuclear device. There is no known way to light off a hydrogen bomb
and hide the effects. Saddam has had five years since the UNSCOM teams
under Richard Butler were expelled. He may have had time to perfect a
delivery system. The counterbalance is the technological advancements for
the United States. If Saddam has a delivery system, it is probably vehicle
based. It is doubtful the Saddam will have any better luck in getting his
planes into the air.
CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE
Saddam continues to deny the existence of any WMD. It suggests he intends
to use WMD against American forces, daring the White House to respond in
kind. We do know that during the first Gulf War, the Bush White House
issued an ultimatum that any WMD would be met with show stopping force. It
is unlikely in light of September 11, the current Bush White House has
backed away from such a policy.
There remains the other possibility that Saddam intends to depart this
world in a blaze of glory and hopes to take as many us with him as
possible. Personally, I think we should have put a .308 between his eyes a
long time ago. Certainly it would have been cheaper and safer than the war
we are about to join.
According to multiple sources, in 1986 Iraq formed a nuclear research
program called Group 4. Saddam’s son-in-law, Hussein Kamel al-Majid
directed the nuclear development. The primary scientists involved in the
effort as Dr. Khalid Ibrahim Sayeed and Dr. Jafaar Dhia Jafaar (most
recently seen at the U.N. negotiating with Secretary General Kofi Annan,
regarding inspections [October 2002]). Group 4’s charter was the
development of a uranium type weapon.
One September 19, 1989, 10:30 A.M. local time Khalid and Jafaar detonated
the bomb. The event registered 2.7 on the Richter scale on the nearby
University of Sulaymaniyah’s seismometer. The doomed prisoners collapsed
the mouth of the cavern using conventional explosives and washed down the
entrance to dilute any radioactive leakage. Those hardy enough to survive
the ordeal were ordered shot and buried in nearby caves by Hussein Kamel
al-Majid.
However, anyone who states Saddam is five to fifteen years away from
developing nuclear weapons, only has to examine the Korean peninsula or
the Pakistan/India border. If they can do it, so can Saddam. These states
have made it clear that they have nuclear weapons in an effort to deter
others from leveraging military force. This is a defensive strategy.
|
Douglas De Bono / DouglasDeBono.Com Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota E-Mail readermail@DouglasDeBono.Com |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |